# TOEFL Discussion: Develop a Counterargument | topin

On this page

## Answer the professor’s question before debating classmates

ETS describes the task as a contribution to an online academic discussion, expressing and supporting an opinion. The current sample gives ten minutes and says an effective response contains at least 100 words. The scoring guide evaluates relevance, elaboration and language control. It does not require a fixed agree-disagree template.

Identify the decision in the question. Should a university fund one service before another is a prioritisation question, while what factor should it consider is a criterion question. An answer about the general value of education can sound fluent while avoiding both. Write the requested decision in your first sentence.

Read the student posts to understand the discussion, then add a reason or qualification of your own. You can build on an existing idea without repeating it word for word. A counterargument is useful when it reveals the condition under which your proposal works or explains why an apparent drawback does not decide the issue.

__Original contribution map.__
| Component  | Job                                       | Question to check                          |
| ---------- | ----------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| Position   | Answer the actual professor prompt        | What am I choosing or recommending?        |
| Reason     | Explain why the position makes sense      | What relationship supports it?             |
| Detail     | Make the relationship concrete            | What would happen in a specific situation? |
| Concession | Acknowledge a relevant limitation         | Does this concern affect my proposal?      |
| Response   | Explain the decision despite that concern | Why does my position still hold?           |

Use the [Academic Discussion task guide](/toefl/writing/academic-discussion) for the basic format. This article focuses on reasoning and revision, with original fictional scenarios. None of the model posts is an ETS answer or a guaranteed rubric score.

## Worked example 1: prioritise a campus service

Original prompt: A university can extend either library opening hours or sports-centre hours. Which should it prioritise? Student A favours the library because students need quiet study space. Student B favours the sports centre because exercise helps students manage stress. Choose a priority and support it.

I would prioritise later library hours during examination periods. The key issue is access to a place where students can complete essential coursework, particularly when their homes are crowded or noisy. For example, a student who shares a room and returns from a part-time job at nine may have no quiet alternative if the library closes immediately afterwards. Longer sports-centre hours could also help with stress, as Student B argues, but exercise does not always require that particular facility. Students may have other options for a short workout, whereas a quiet desk with the required course materials can be harder to replace. I would review demand after the examination period rather than assume the library needs the same extended schedule throughout the year.

The post chooses a service and limits the recommendation to a period. The example develops why access matters. The concession addresses the sports-centre argument without pretending exercise has no value. The response compares substitutability: one need may have alternatives while another is harder to meet elsewhere.

A weaker version would say libraries are important, sports are important, and both should receive funding. That avoids the budget choice. A qualified priority still answers the question if it specifies when and why the proposed allocation should occur.

For transfer, change the two services to evening transport and longer cafeteria hours. Build a new comparison based on the prompt’s constraints. Do not copy the quiet-room example if it no longer explains the choice.

## Worked example 2: respond to a plausible objection

Original prompt: Should a university require attendance in all introductory classes? Student A argues attendance helps students build habits. Student B says adults should manage their own time. Write a supported view that considers how the policy would work.

I would require participation in introductory classes without making physical attendance the only acceptable form. These courses often teach the methods students need for later work, so disappearing for several weeks can create gaps that are difficult to repair. However, a rigid attendance rule could disadvantage a student with unavoidable work or caring responsibilities. A better policy would allow a documented alternative, such as completing the class activity and contributing to a short online discussion. This preserves the learning purpose while recognising that presence alone does not prove understanding. Student A is right that routines matter, but the routine should involve meaningful engagement rather than merely signing a register. The university could then identify students who are missing both classes and alternative work and contact them early.

The counterargument is not a detached sentence beginning nevertheless. It changes the policy design: require participation, provide an appropriate alternative and identify disengagement. The response answers the original attendance question with a qualified position instead of moving to an unrelated topic about online education.

Check the causal chain: introductory methods support later study; missed engagement creates gaps; an alternative can preserve that engagement. If your example does not connect these steps, add the missing relationship rather than another general claim about convenience.

For a new version, support a stricter attendance policy in practical laboratory classes. Explain why the alternative arrangement in the model might not meet that different need. This exercise tests whether your reasoning is conditional, not whether you can repeat a balanced-sounding phrase.

## Worked example 3: give a criterion rather than a yes/no slogan

Original prompt: What is the most important factor a university should consider before moving a student service entirely online? Student A emphasises reduced operating costs. Student B emphasises convenient access. Name the factor you think should carry the most weight.

The most important factor is whether students can still complete the essential task when the online system fails or is difficult for them to use. Lower costs and flexible access are valuable, but neither helps a student who cannot submit a time-sensitive request. For example, if an accommodation application moves online, the university should provide an accessible interface and a clear alternative route for users who encounter a technical barrier. This does not mean keeping every old paper process forever. It means identifying the situations in which a failure would exclude someone and providing a workable response. I would therefore judge the change by successful task completion across different student circumstances, rather than only by the number of visits to the website or the money saved.

The question asks for a factor, and the answer supplies one: reliable task completion. It considers cost and convenience as relevant competing factors, then explains why they are insufficient alone. It does not pretend that a counterargument must come from disagreement with one named student.

Notice that the examples are hypothetical. The model does not claim a real university has excluded students or saved a particular amount. You can use a plausible scenario to clarify reasoning without inventing research figures, expert quotations or institutional facts.

Try a new criterion such as privacy or staff support, then ask whether the example actually demonstrates its importance. If the evidence still concerns technical failure, it may support reliability more directly than your chosen privacy claim.

## Repair weak concessions and undeveloped claims

A concession should change what follows or clarify why your position survives. Many short posts acknowledge both sides but never make a decision. Others add a token sentence such as some people disagree without naming the objection. Neither provides much reasoning.

__Original sentence-level revisions.__
| Weak sentence                 | Useful replacement                                                                               | Reason                         |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------ |
| Both options have advantages. | I would extend library hours during examinations because quiet study space is harder to replace. | Makes a prioritised choice     |
| Some people disagree.         | A strict attendance rule could disadvantage students with unavoidable caring duties.             | Names the relevant objection   |
| Technology is useful.         | An online service is useful only if students can complete the required task reliably.            | Defines the condition          |
| This is good for everyone.    | This arrangement gives late-working students an accessible study option.                         | Specifies who benefits and how |
| The student is wrong.         | That concern matters, but an alternative participation route can address it.                     | Responds to the reasoning      |

After content revision, inspect sentence links. Because should introduce a real cause, whereas should contrast comparable ideas, and therefore should follow from the preceding explanation. Connectors cannot create logic that the underlying sentences do not provide.

The scoring guide values effective language variety, but an ambitious structure that obscures your meaning is not a useful upgrade. Keep the subject and verb clear. If embedded questions or clause order cause repeated problems, use the [word-order exercises](/articles/toefl-embedded-question-word-order).

The task rubric runs from 0 to 5; the reported Writing section uses 1–6 bands. Do not call one edited practice paragraph a guaranteed band 6 response. Evaluate what the paragraph does and then test the same reasoning skill on a fresh timed prompt.

## Practise a ten-minute contribution, then revise one cause

Use a short planning note: requested decision, reason, concrete situation and relevant limitation if needed. Our suggested budget is about one minute for that note, eight for writing and one for checking. The division is a preparation choice, while the ten-minute task limit comes from the current ETS sample.

* Read the professor’s exact decision or criterion question.
* Choose one position you can support specifically.
* Explain a causal relationship rather than list several labels.
* Use a concession only when it improves the answer.
* Aim to meet the sample’s at-least-100-word guidance with relevant development.
* Leave time to check omissions, unclear references and sentence boundaries.

Take topin’s [free TOEFL mock](/toefl/practice-test), marked on the official scale, to see how this task holds up after the email and sentence work. Keep the timed version separate from the corrected one. Compare which reasoning step disappeared under pressure, then practise that step on a new topic.

The [email request examples](/articles/toefl-email-request-examples) use practical elaboration for a particular recipient. Here, the elaboration needs to support an academic position. Learning that difference helps you avoid turning a discussion post into a request letter or a formal five-paragraph essay.

## Try a full TOEFL mock free

Timed like test day, every section scored, every answer explained.

[Take the free mock ](/toefl/login)

## FAQs

Is a counterargument required?

No. Use it if it develops the position or addresses a relevant concern. A direct, well-supported contribution can work without a fixed counterargument sentence.

Must I disagree with a classmate?

No. You can agree, qualify or add another perspective. The task is to express and support an opinion in your own words, not manufacture a disagreement.

How many words should I write?

ETS’s current sample says an effective discussion response contains at least 100 words. Develop relevant reasoning rather than treating a word total as a sufficient answer.

Can I use fictional examples?

A clearly hypothetical situation can explain your reasoning. Do not invent research data or present an imaginary institutional fact as verified evidence.

Are the model posts guaranteed top scores?

No. They are original learning examples with explanations. The task rubric and full-section scoring are different, and a model is not an official evaluated response.

## Sources (checked 5 October 2026)

* [ETS: current Writing tasks; checked 5 October 2026](https://www.ets.org/toefl/test-takers/ibt/about/content/writing.html)
* [ETS: 2026 Practice Test 1 directions; checked 5 October 2026](https://www.ets.org/content/dam/ets-org/pdfs/toefl/toefl-ibt-full-length-practice-test-1.pdf)
* [ETS: email and academic discussion scoring guides; checked 5 October 2026](https://www.ets.org/content/dam/ets-org/pdfs/toefl/writing-rubrics.pdf)
* [ETS: Writing lesson plans; checked 5 October 2026](https://www.ets.org/content/dam/ets-org/pdfs/toefl/toefl-ibt-lesson-plan-writing.pdf)

## Related articles

[All TOEFL study guides ](/toefl)

* [TOEFLStudy plans & strategyA four-week current TOEFL planFollow a four-week TOEFL plan with a diagnostic, weekly task priorities, timed checkpoints and a readiness decision based on current-format practice evidence.Updated 5 Oct 2026](/articles/toefl-four-week-study-plan)
* [TOEFLStudy plans & strategyTOEFL alongside a full-time jobFit TOEFL preparation around a full-time job with an eight-week, six-hour schedule, short weekday drills, weekend checkpoints and rules for missed sessions.Updated 5 Oct 2026](/articles/toefl-eight-week-working-plan)
* [TOEFLStudy plans & strategyPacing the adaptive TOEFLManage TOEFL’s adaptive modules with separate Reading review and Listening reset routines, worked timing decisions and an error log without invented routing rules.Updated 5 Oct 2026](/articles/toefl-adaptive-pacing-2026)
* [TOEFLStudy plans & strategyTOEFL email requests: three worked examplesPractise TOEFL email requests with three original scenarios, model responses, tone corrections and a seven-minute method for making every requested action clear.Updated 5 Oct 2026](/articles/toefl-email-request-examples)